Buy vs Rent

Buy the house, or rent the same house and put every dollar you didn't spend on owning it into an index fund. Both paths are scored the same way — what you'd walk away with if you cashed out that year.

At year 30

Net worth if you cash out that year

Buy Rent & invest

Year by year

Year S&P Rate Home value Loan balance Equity Own /mo Rent /mo Difference Buy net worth Rent net worth Gap

How both sides are scored

Buy is the home's value minus what's left on the mortgage minus what it costs to sell — plus anything the owner invested in months where owning was cheaper than renting.

Rent & invest is the portfolio: the down payment and closing costs on day one, plus every monthly dollar owning would have cost above the rent, compounding at your assumed return.

Same yardstick both sides — cash in hand if you liquidated. Neither path gets credit for money it hasn't actually got.

What's modeled

A real month-by-month amortization schedule. PMI drops off the month equity crosses 20% of the home's current value. Property tax and maintenance track the home's value as it appreciates; insurance and HOA grow with cost inflation; rent grows on its own curve.

Investment tax drag comes off the return every year — 0.5 points is a reasonable stand-in for the tax on dividends and rebalancing in a taxable brokerage account.

What isn't — read this before you trust it

No mortgage interest deduction. Most filers take the standard deduction and get nothing from it; if you'd itemize, buying does a little better than shown here.

No capital gains tax on the sale. A primary residence is largely exempt (§121); the renter's portfolio isn't, and the tax drag only approximates that. The renter's side is the slightly optimistic one on the way out.

No transaction costs on the buy side beyond closing and selling, no rent-side insurance, no moving costs, no vacancy. And in the default mode, no volatility — both returns are smooth, and reality is not. That is what the backtest is for.